Movie review: Lady Gaga’s House of Gucci joins Hollywood’s very expensive mistakes

0

This picture, published by MGM, shows Lady Gaga as Patrizia Reggiani at the Gucci home. Photo / included

REVIEW:

It’s both sad and hilarious when a glitzy, star-studded Hollywood movie that cost about $ 100 million does as well as Paul Blart: Mall Cop.

The upcoming House Of Gucci was supposed to be that big, beautiful, lively movie that steals the summer and makes everyone talk. The crime drama – based on the true story of Patrizia Reggiani, the ex-wife of Maurizio Gucci planned to kill her husband, heir to the luxury fashion house Gucci – will hit Australian theaters on New Years Day, but some early reviews from the US show that the strip is more of a bargain than high-end.

Watch the trailer here:

As it sounds, it would have been more entertaining if the producers simply edited two and a half hours of CCTV footage from Lowes.

The New York Post rated the film one of four stars, describing it as “a hodgepodge of crazy performances and different tones,” stating, “The abysmal Gucci might get a better grade if it did a term paper called” How ” would make the murder of a famous person boring. “

Lady Gaga as Patrizia Reggiani.  Photo / included
Lady Gaga as Patrizia Reggiani. Photo / included

On the surface, this film has everything that speaks for it. It’s about a glamorous world in an iconic global fashion house. The production had a budget of A $ 105 million to play with. Legendary director Ridley Scott heads an A-list cast including Lady Gaga, Jared Leto, Salma Hayek, Adam Driver and Al Pacino.

But that is exactly the problem these days. All the equipment, I don’t know. It’s like the people who do such productions think it’s an automatic win – just because it’s expensive and a few celebrities are attached to it. Nothing else has to be good because all of us bozos who see it will be blinded by the fancy clothes and bewitched by Lady Gaga’s fake Italian accent (this accent has also been featured in many reviews. Even the movie Trainer’s own dialect said this week in an interview that it sounds more Russian than Italian).

This picture, released by MGM, shows Jack Huston as Domenico De Sole (left) and Lady Gaga as Patrizia Reggiani in the House of Gucci.  Photo / included
This picture, released by MGM, shows Jack Huston as Domenico De Sole (left) and Lady Gaga as Patrizia Reggiani in the House of Gucci. Photo / included

As a viewer, films like “House of Gucci” can be bad, but they can also be good at the same time. On a technical level, it can be a stinker who doesn’t live up to the hype. And that’s what makes watching it so exciting. It’s great because it’s awful. Films like this have the potential to become future camp classics, like Faye Dunaway as Joan Crawford in 1981’s Mommie Dearest.

“Gucci: It was a name that sounded so sweet, so seductive,” purrs Lady Gaga, who plays Patrizia Reggiani, in one of the trailers. “They had it all: wealth, style, power … who wouldn’t kill for it?”

We’d totally kill everyone for that. But we’d kill for a reasonably decent movie, too. And wealth, style, and power don’t guarantee excellent production.

This picture, published by MGM, shows Jared Leto as Paolo Gucci in the House of Gucci.  Photo / included
This picture, published by MGM, shows Jared Leto as Paolo Gucci in the House of Gucci. Photo / included

“Morning Wars” – or “The Morning Show” as it is called outside of Australia – is the same. With Jennifer Aniston and Reese Witherspoon on the fronts of the show, it was the jewel in the crown of Apple TV + when the streaming service launched in late 2019.

The original idea was simple: a fast-paced series set in the shiny, toxic, and ridiculously lucrative world of American breakfast television. But the first letter was thrown out the window when the Matt Lauer sexual harassment scandal broke out and the #MeToo era kicked into action. The whole thing has been rewritten to reflect all of this.

Starting with Apple, the goal was to deliver unrivaled blockbuster television. The series is reported to cost A $ 21 million per episode to produce – a total of A $ 420 million for the first two seasons.

The result? An indulgent mess that pounces on every opportunity to talk about society and the state of the media industry in self-righteous speeches – all in an effort to appear important.

Trying to be up to date with hot button topics – #MeToo, the coronavirus pandemic, demolition culture – just make the series seem out of date, even though the season two finale only fell last week.

Jennifer Aniston and Reese Witherspoon are phenomenal to watch – their performances, as well as the shiny sets and locations, keep you from switching off. Still, they deserve better.

This picture, published by MGM, shows Al Pacino as Aldo Gucci in the House of Gucci.  Photo / included
This picture, published by MGM, shows Al Pacino as Aldo Gucci in the House of Gucci. Photo / included

Writing desperately wants to be included in the prestige television category, but in reality it’s just an expensive soap opera. “Dynasty” is set in a breakfast television studio.

As season two ends, Jennifer Aniston passes out when she hits her head on a bedside table after tripping over a shoe. This is just theft from the “Home And Away” playbook.

The saddest part is thinking about the lofty heights that could have been achieved if Paul Blart: Mall Cop had been budgeted for $ 100 million.


Source link

Share.

About Author

Comments are closed.